Date: 2006-12-03 07:59 am (UTC)From: [identity profile] rurounihime.livejournal.com
I'd say it's very much an individual issue, and not a lump-sum issue at all, and THAT is where people are making a mistake with this whole "sanctity of marriage" thing. You don't automatically get to have a good marriage just because you are straight or bi or gay. Just like you don't automatically get to be a good mother just because you are a woman of child-bearing age. It's individual: some people are cut out to be parents, others are not. Some people are cut out to be married, others are not. It's not a right (and by this I mean a biological right, not a legal right), it's a privilege.

I know plenty of stable het marriages. I know plenty of unstable ones. I know plenty of stable gay marriages. I know plenty of unstable ones. The line shouldn't be drawn through sexuality, but rather through individual ability and effort.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

rurounihime: (Default)
rurounihime

May 2018

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
2021 2223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 19th, 2025 09:33 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios